i'm sick of being played. time magazine's newest cover, above, touts the title 'are you mom enough?' and is coupled with the image of a mother letting her at-least preschool age child suck her nip. maybe that sounds crude, but let's be honest: that image is not one of a mother nursing her child. i don't know any mothers who really nurse their children past baby-hood, but if i were a betting woman i would put money on the idea that there isn't too many mothers out there who let their kids stand on a chair to nurse in that way. time's sole purpose for that image: to sell magazines.
the lead article is about attachment parenting, which is a novel idea: nursing on demand, co-sleeping, and baby wearing, ect. i have done each of these things at one time or another as i am sure most moms have and there are lots of studies and information that really supports the theory. so attachment parenting is great. fine, whatever.
but, it isn't practical! it isn't practical for a working mom and it isn't practical for a stay at home mom either. the only person it does sound practical enough for is an employed nanny whose job it is to tend to the tot 24/7. but if there are moms out there who believe this is the way to go and want to make it a priority, then by all means.
the point is: why are we still attacking mothers?!
the caption on the cover insinuates that these extreme attachment parenting moms are the 'real moms' out there because they sacrifice it all for their kiddos. and "all" is really quite loose here based on what you believe sacrificing means, but why? and for some reason i feel like this article is just a straw man for the real debate, yet again: stay at home moms vs. working moms, because obviously a working mother will have a harder time being able to do some of the attachment stuff.
i just don't get it. what one family does will never be right for the next family and what is right for that family won't be for the first one. or maybe it is. either way, why judge and condemn and suggest otherwise? what i don't get is that we know every one and every family is different. we are different. and mothering is so hard as is. we don't need another publication or opinion to tell us how to do what we already innately know how to do.
and this of course this is coming off the heels of a political snafu, in my opinion. and i realize i am getting into some deep water with this one, but our president just endorsed gay marriage. kind of. and i really feel like a whole demographic of people just got played with this one, too. obama basically just said what we all knew: he supports gay marriage. ...and so what? policy is not going to change. at least, not right now, which is why i think he said it in the first place. election year. he is riding the fence: i support you but i also support you who who will not vote for it. i don't know, just seemed like a slap in the face to all those people who might have felt like obama was going to be a voice for them.
and just so there is no confusion, i am not in support of same-sex marriage. domestic partnership or some kind of union that the state recognizes, yes, but not marriage. and that is my own personal opinion that i have labored and prayed over and not something that i apologize for but i am so very sympathetic about this also because this is people's lives. and people are hurting over this. and i say, with the president, leave it up to the states.
i don't even know how to end this post properly except to say that my husband and three of four sons are gone for the whole night on a camping trip and i am pretty excited about it. plus they took our dog and i am super happy about that. the hate part of our relationship has been a little stronger lately since she has been running away and today she even broke her metal-infused tie-out to go play with the neighbor's dog. i know i sound mean, but i am just being honest. she is hard work. way harder than taking care of humans. any dog people out there have any helpful hints?
happy weekend!